Skip to main content

Vaccine scepticism in South Africa is Alive and Well

image source: jcomp

With the new decree regarding the wearing of masks put into place, that means not wearing a mask could have one facing a fine and/or jailtime, there seems to be little room in South Africa for the mask scepticism that took hold across the Atlantic in the United States of America. However, the covid-19 vaccine scepticism is another story entirely, as it seems to be a topic of debate and contention- should we be nervous about the vaccine? Perhaps. But should we be downright opposed to it as many citizens seem to be? Exactly how dangerous is vaccine scepticism in general, and more specifically in South Africa's ongoing battle with the pandemic?

Opposition to vaccination, or as it is now called, being 'anti-vaxx' has been around for hundreds of years, even before vaccines really existed. The "new wave" of the anti-vaccine movement appears to have begun with the publishing of an article in the Lancet by Andrew Wakefield. Those who were mere sceptics, highly suggestible and perhaps a touch paranoid, were emboldened by such official and indisputably scientific support of their positions, and thanks to social media, could spread their message and grow as a lobbying force, and grow they did, amassing Facebook groups and popular social media accounts, one such group having over 200 000 members at one point. Some A list celebrities with large followings declared themselves to be anti-vaxx. Just one problem- the article was quickly debunked, the article's author became a pariah in the medical community and was struck off the register, and many articles and studies have been published since in response, and they repeatedly disprove the claims made by Wakefield and the movement he helped legitimize. But, unfortunately, the damage was already done. Measles, which had previously been eradicated in a number of countries, and had been close to eradicated in others, has made a nasty global resurgence, thanks in large part to the promulgation of anti-vaccination misinformation. Coincidentally, Wakefield has once again resurfaced to make false claims against the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines.

Medical scepticism in general has been costly in terms of human life here in South Africa, where we must deal simultaneously with another ongoing pandemic- the HIV/AIDS pandemic. On this front, it would be remiss of me not to discuss President Thabo Mbeki's remarks and policy positions on the Aids crisis; during his presidency his government withheld critical medications for HIV sufferers, he consulted with HIV/Aids denialists on public policy, publicly denied there was a link between HIV and Aids, and gave platforms to other HIV/Aids denialists. Many within the medical community criticised him for having aided in the popularization of HIV/Aids denialism in the country. 

      Combine the influence of the pre-existing anti-vaxx movement, whose existence online means it is only one click away for any member of the general public, the medical scepticism borne of Thabo Mbeki's presidency, and the overall anxious state that many South Africans find themselves in as we continue into the economically taxing lockdown, and we have grounds fertile for an anti covid-19 vaccine movement- anti-Covaxxers, if you will. The combination of fear and misinformation can be a dangerous motivator. The best move forward is just as President Cyril Ramaphosa stated in his address to the nation on January 11 “do[ing] everything possible to ensure that the process is transparent and that all information is available”. In that same address, Ramaphosa laid out the path forward for vaccine procurement, assuring South Africans that government was working assiduously to ensure enough vaccines would be obtained for the goal of reaching population immunity.

       However, somewhat discouraging is the less than impressive feedback from others within government working on the issue- when the Deputy Director General for Department of health Anban Pillay was interviewed by ENCA journalist Shahan Ramkissoon, he became defensive, and even openly hostile to Ramkissoon, who asked pointed but straightforward questions, questions that were relevant to the lives of many South Africans, and that someone in his position should be able to answer. It could perhaps be chalked up to being a poor showing by one official. But, is it a hint at what is happening inside the Covid-19 response units in government on which we now rely for the vaccine? Either way, it only heightens vaccine anxiety. 

      Given that we, along with the United Kingdom, are in the unique position of facing a newer, more contagious strain of the coronavirus, we cannot afford any more misinformation regarding vaccines to be circulated. The fact is these vaccines are new, research into them and their effects are just beginning, but those who should be trusted regarding information on vaccines are the international organisations and local medical community as well as medical experts. Treat all information received from additional sources, especially those online, with a grain of salt. Vaccination will be an important tool in ending the pandemic, and so vaccine scepticism must be treated as the serious danger that it is. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Constitutional Validity Maintained: The Constitutional Court Declines to Strike Down Section 10(2) of the Recognition Act

Constitutional Validity Maintained: The Constitutional Court Declines to Strike Down Section 10(2) of the Recognition Act By Ocean Postman On 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court handed down their decision in a landmark case that will come to define how we understand the synchronous presence of both customary and civil marriages in South Africa. The Court’s ruling served to clarify and affirm that customary marriages and civil marriages remain on par with one another and caution South Africans entering into these marriage arrangements to understand the rule of law as it applies to both. The judgement was in the case VVC v JRM and Others, where the High Court previously upheld that certain impugned provisions of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act , namely as it pertains to section 10(2), were unconstitutional. Upon application for its validity, the Constitutional Court did not confirm the High court’s position.  photo source: unsplash.com Instead, the Constitutional co...
The Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) bill is now an act signed into law by President Cyril Ramaphosa , however allowances have been made for continued public comment and consultation regarding certain clauses of the bill, which have been the subject of contention.  The act is an amendment on pre-existing legislation, the South Africans Schools Act of 1996. The amendments specifically seek to reform the institution of codes of conduct, admissions policies, making more explicit the prohibition on corporal punishment,  financial policy with regards to public schools and language policy reform. The final point being the one which has garnered the most attention from interest groups.  A close analysis of the bill’s contested clauses reveals that language policy is indeed on the agenda. The act’s proposals however, are the result of repetitive themes of anti-constitutional exclusion and subpar education to the detriment of the most socio-economically vulnerable children of...

Declining Birthrate Is No Cause for Celebration

  Declining Birth Rates Are No Cause for Celebration By Ocean Postman Stats SA has reported a decline in South Africa’s fertility rate from 2,78 children per woman to 2,21 in the Mid-Year Population Estimates report , 2025. They confirm that this decline is part of a trend that began in 2020 that has seen the average number of children a woman would have in her life declining over the past five years.   One might view this as a positive outcome, credited to a concerted effort by the government to ensure greater access in the provision of contraceptives. Evidence of the government’s commitments on paper to expanding contraceptive access includes its adoption of the Family Planning 2020 Initiative, a multinational effort to expand access to reproductive related healthcare. The state’s “rights-based” approach to healthcare policy related to reproductive care is, on its face, promising. It would certainly be a great stride forward in the aim towards women’s rights if this we...